CELPIP Speaking Task 5 feels harder than it is because the task looks like a comparison question. It is not really a comparison question.
It is a persuasion task with a comparison inside it. If you spend too long trying to find the perfect option, you lose the part that actually scores: making a clear choice, explaining the tradeoff, and convincing the listener in 60 seconds.
What Task 5 is actually testing
Task 5 gives you two options. First, you compare the options and choose one. Then you get 60 seconds to prepare before speaking for 60 seconds. The prompt usually asks you to persuade someone else to support your choice.
That means your response has three jobs:
- Choose one option clearly.
- Compare the two options without describing every detail.
- Persuade the listener that your choice is better for the situation.
Most weak answers fail because they treat those jobs equally. They spend 40 seconds explaining both options, then rush the actual argument at the end.
The stronger move is to decide fast and use the comparison only as evidence.
The mistake: comparing for too long
Here is the common Task 5 trap:
"Option A is good because it is cheaper and close to downtown. Option B is also good because it has more space and better parking. Option A looks modern, but Option B is more comfortable. I think both are useful, but maybe Option B is better..."
That sounds balanced, but balance is not the goal. The listener still does not know what you want them to do.
You do not get extra points for sounding undecided. You get points for task fulfillment, content and coherence, vocabulary, and listenability. A response that wanders between both options usually hurts all four:
- Task fulfillment: You did not persuade clearly.
- Content and coherence: Your points feel scattered.
- Vocabulary: You repeat safe words like "good," "better," and "nice."
- Listenability: You sound rushed because the argument starts too late.
The fix is not more vocabulary. It is a sharper decision.
Use a 10-40-10 structure
For a 60-second Task 5 response, use this structure:
- 10 seconds: choose and name the decisive criterion
- 40 seconds: compare only the two strongest tradeoffs
- 10 seconds: close with a direct persuasive push
That gives the answer a clear shape without making it sound memorized.
First 10 seconds: choose immediately
Start with the choice and the reason category:
"I would choose Option B because it gives us more long-term value, especially for families."
That opening does two things. It tells the listener where you stand, and it tells them what lens you are using to judge the options.
Do not start with:
"There are two options and both have advantages and disadvantages."
That sentence is true, but it wastes time. The prompt already tells the listener there are two options.
Middle 40 seconds: compare decisive tradeoffs
Pick two comparison points that actually matter. Usually they fall into one of these categories:
- cost
- convenience
- safety
- comfort
- long-term usefulness
- who benefits most
- risk or downside
The key is to compare across the options, not describe them separately.
Weak:
"Option A is cheaper. Option B is bigger."
Stronger:
"Option A is cheaper upfront, but Option B gives us more space and would still work as our needs change. So even though it costs more now, it is less likely to become a problem later."
That is persuasion. You are not just naming facts. You are explaining why one fact matters more than another.
Final 10 seconds: ask for agreement
End by speaking to the person you are persuading:
"So I really think we should go with Option B. It solves the bigger problem, and we will not have to rethink the decision in a few months."
The close should not introduce a new reason. It should make the listener feel that the decision is settled.
A model Task 5 response
Sample prompt:
Your community centre can fund one new weekend program. Option A is a cooking class for adults. Option B is a fitness class for families. Choose one option and persuade your friend to support it.
Model response:
I would choose the family fitness class because it helps a wider group of people, not just adults who already enjoy cooking. The cooking class is useful, and I can see why some people would prefer it, but it mainly serves one type of participant. A family fitness class is more flexible because parents and children can attend together, which makes it easier for busy families to actually show up. It also supports health and community at the same time. People are not just learning something for one weekend, they are building a habit together. So I think we should support the fitness class. It would bring more people into the centre and create a stronger long-term benefit.
Notice the pattern:
- clear choice in the first sentence
- one fair acknowledgment of the other option
- two decisive reasons
- direct persuasive close
It does not list every detail. It argues.
What to do during prep time
Task 5 gives you more preparation time than most speaking tasks, but that can backfire. More prep time makes people over-plan.
Use the first scan to answer one question:
Which option is easier to defend?
Not which option is objectively better. Easier to defend.
On test day, you are not making a real-life decision. You are producing a clear spoken argument under time pressure. Pick the side that gives you cleaner reasons.
During prep, write down only three bullets:
- Choice: Option A or Option B
- Reason 1: the strongest practical advantage
- Reason 2: the strongest contrast against the other option
If you write more than that, you will probably try to say too much.
The comparison phrases that help most
You do not need fancy vocabulary for Task 5. You need comparison language that makes your reasoning easy to follow.
Use phrases like:
- "The main advantage of Option A is..."
- "The downside is..."
- "Compared with Option B..."
- "Even though Option A is cheaper..."
- "Option B makes more sense because..."
- "For this specific situation..."
- "That matters more than..."
The last phrase is especially useful. Task 5 is really about priority. One option may be cheaper, but the other may be safer. One may be convenient, but the other may help more people. Your job is to explain which benefit matters more.
How Task 5 differs from Task 7
Task 5 and Task 7 both ask you to argue, but they do not feel the same.
In Task 7, you defend an opinion on a broad topic for 90 seconds. You need more development, examples, and sometimes a counterargument.
In Task 5, the evidence is already on the screen. Your job is faster: choose, compare, persuade. You do not need a broad philosophical argument. You need a practical recommendation.
That is why Task 5 rewards decisiveness more than depth. A simple argument delivered clearly beats a complex comparison delivered late.
Quick practice drill
Take any everyday two-option decision:
- apartment A vs. apartment B
- online course vs. in-person class
- gym membership vs. home workout equipment
- weekend trip vs. saving money
Give yourself 60 seconds to prepare and 60 seconds to speak. After recording, check three things:
- Did you choose in the first sentence?
- Did you compare the options directly?
- Did your final sentence sound persuasive, not neutral?
If the answer to any of those is no, do the same prompt again. Do not move to a new topic yet. Repeating the same prompt is how you train the structure.
Task 5 does not reward the person who notices every detail. It rewards the person who can make a clean choice and make that choice sound reasonable.
For related depth, read the complete CELPIP speaking practice guide and the Task 7 opinion structure guide. Together, they cover the difference between practical persuasion and longer opinion development.
Use CELPIP Speaking Coach to record Task 5 responses with real timers, then review whether your choice, comparison, and persuasive close are clear enough to score.
Get notified when we launch
Join the waitlist and be first to practice with AI scoring.