Reading Part 4: Reading for Viewpoints

iRead the following article.

The fate of the Rialto Theatre, a grand but crumbling 1920s cinema in the heart of Elmwood, has become the town's most heated debate. The council must soon decide whether to fund an expensive restoration or sell the site to a developer who would replace it with a much-needed parking garage. Leading the campaign to save the Rialto is local historian Priya Anand. "This building is the soul of our downtown," she says. "It is one of the last grand theatres of its kind in the region, and once it is gone, it is gone forever." Its ornate plaster ceiling and rows of red velvet seats, she notes, could never be rebuilt at any sensible cost today. Anand argues that a restored Rialto could host films, concerts, and community events, drawing visitors and life back to a struggling main street. "Towns that tear down their history end up looking like everywhere else," she warns. "Heritage is not a luxury; it is part of what makes people want to come here in the first place." Councillor Doug Fraser is unconvinced. He points to the price tag. "The engineers estimate the restoration at nearly six million dollars," he says. "That is money we simply do not have, for a building most residents have not set foot in for thirty years." He would rather see scarce public funds spent on repairing the town's crumbling roads and its overstretched library. Fraser argues that a modern parking structure would ease the chronic shortage of spaces that local businesses blame for driving shoppers out to the suburban malls. "I love old buildings as much as anyone," he says, "but I have to be practical with taxpayers' money." Others are caught in the middle. Café owner Lena Petrov can see both sides. "A restored theatre would bring people downtown in the evenings, which would be wonderful for my business," she says, "but if my daytime customers cannot find anywhere to park, that hurts me just as much." The council will hear public submissions before making its decision this spring.

iUsing the drop-down menu, choose the best option according to the information given.

1. Priya Anand's main argument for saving the Rialto is that
2. Anand says that a restored Rialto could
3. Councillor Fraser's main objection is that
4. Fraser argues that a parking garage would
5. Lena Petrov's view is that she

iHere is a reader comment. Complete it by choosing the best option for each blank.

I grew up going to Saturday matinees at the Rialto, so my heart is with Ms. Anand. A town that 6. its landmarks loses a piece of itself, and no parking garage ever drew a visitor from out of town. And yet Councillor Fraser is not wrong about the 7.; six million dollars is a staggering sum for a place many have forgotten. What frustrates me is that the whole thing is framed as 8. — theatre or garage, heritage or parking — when a little imagination might find room for both. Could the ground floor not become parking while the auditorium above is 9.? Before we 10. something irreplaceable, the council owes us a proper look at the alternatives.